首页> 外文OA文献 >Keats, myth, and the science of sympathy
【2h】

Keats, myth, and the science of sympathy

机译:济慈,神话和同情科学

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This essay considers the connections between myth and sympathy in Keats’s poetic theory and practice. It argues that the ‘Ode to Psyche’ exemplifies the way in which Keats uses mythological narrative, and the related trope of apostrophe, to promote a restrained form of sympathy, which preserves an objectifying distance between the poet and the feelings that his poetry examines. This model of sympathy is informed by Keats’s medical training: the influential surgeon Astley Cooper and The Hospital Pupil’s Guide (1816) both identify a sensitive but restrained sympathy for patients’ suffering as an essential part of the scientific and professional methods of nineteenth-century medicine. However, while The Hospital Pupil’s Guide claims that mythological superstition has been superseded in medicine by positivist science, Keats’s ode suggests that myth retains a central role in poetry, as the foundation of a poetic method that mediates between imaginative sympathy and objective impartiality.
机译:本文探讨了济慈诗歌理论与实践中神话与同情之间的联系。它认为,“心灵颂歌”体现了济慈使用神话叙事以及相关的撇号提法促进受限制的同情形式的方式,这种同情形式保留了诗人与其诗歌所考察的情感之间的客观距离。这种同情模式是由济慈的医学培训提供的:有影响力的外科医生阿斯特利·库珀(Astley Cooper)和《医院学生指南》(The Hospital Pupil's Guide)(1816)都将对患者痛苦的敏感但受限制的同情视为十九世纪科学和专业方法的重要组成部分。然而,尽管《医院学生指南》声称神话迷信已被实证主义科学取代了医学,但济慈的颂歌表明,神话在诗歌中保持着核心作用,作为在想象的同情和客观公正之间进行调解的诗歌方法的基础。

著录项

  • 作者

    Tate, Gregory Paul;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-31 14:40:49

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号